Skip to content
Ahtum
EntityQ554801· pop 13· linked from 61 articles

Also known as Ajtony, Achtum

Ajtony, Ahtum or Achtum (, , , ) was an early-11th-century ruler in the territory now known as Banat in present Romania and Serbia. His primary source is the Long Life of Saint Gerard, a 14th-century hagiography. Ajtony was a powerful ruler who owned many horses, cattle and sheep and was baptised according to the Orthodox rite in Vidin. He taxed salt which was transferred to King Stephen I of Hungary on the Mureș River. The king sent Csanád, Ajtony's former commander-in-chief, against him at the head of a large army. Csanád defeated and killed Ajtony, occupying his realm. In the territory, at

Wikidata facts

Instance of
human
Gender
male
Citizenship
Banat
Place of death
Tomnatic
Occupation
ruler
Position held
monarch
Show 2 more facts
date of birth
1000-00-00
date of death
1100-00-00
Sources (1)

via Wikidata · CC0

~11 min read

Encyclopedic overview

10 sections
Contents
  • Background
  • {{anchor|Ajtony in the primary sources}}In primary sources
  • {{anchor|Ajtony in modern historiography}}In modern historiography
  • See also
  • References
  • Sources
  • {{anchor|Primary sources}}Primary
  • {{anchor|Secondary sources}}Secondary
  • Further reading
  • External links

Ajtony, Ahtum or Achtum (, , , ) was an early-11th-century ruler in the territory now known as Banat in present Romania and Serbia. His primary source is the Long Life of Saint Gerard, a 14th-century hagiography. Ajtony was a powerful ruler who owned many horses, cattle and sheep and was baptised according to the Orthodox rite in Vidin. He taxed salt which was transferred to King Stephen I of Hungary on the Mureș River. The king sent Csanád, Ajtony's former commander-in-chief, against him at the head of a large army. Csanád defeated and killed Ajtony, occupying his realm. In the territory, at least one county and a Roman Catholic diocese were established.

Historians disagree on the year of Ajtony's defeat; it may have occurred in 1002, 1008 or between 1027 and 1030. His ethnicity is also a subject of historical debate; he may have been Hungarian, Kabar or Pecheneg.

Excerpted from Wikipedia’s “Ahtum” article, available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 licence.

Gallery (6)