Skip to content
interrogation

File:Police_interrogation_room.jpg · Wikimedia Commons · See Wikimedia Commons

EntityQ327018· pop 43· linked from 796 articles

interrogation

Sign in to save

Also known as interrogating, police interrogation, police questioning, interviewing in law enforcement, questioning

thumb|A police interrogation room in Switzerland Interrogation (also called questioning) is interviewing as commonly employed by law enforcement officers, military personnel, intelligence agencies, organized crime syndicates, and terrorist organizations with the goal of eliciting useful information, particularly information related to suspected crime. Interrogation may involve a diverse array of techniques, ranging from developing a congenial rapport with the subject to torture.

Wikidata facts

Show 1 more fact
Commons category
Interrogation
Sources (4)

via Wikidata · CC0

~9 min read

Article

16 sections
Contents
  • Techniques
  • Deception
  • Verbal and non-verbal cues
  • Good cop/bad cop
  • Rotating interrogators
  • Mind-altering drugs
  • Torture
  • By country
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
  • Police interrogation
  • Constitutional protections
  • Push for mandatory recording of interrogations in the U.S.
  • See also
  • References
  • External links

thumb|A police interrogation room in Switzerland Interrogation (also called questioning) is interviewing as commonly employed by law enforcement officers, military personnel, intelligence agencies, organized crime syndicates, and terrorist organizations with the goal of eliciting useful information, particularly information related to suspected crime. Interrogation may involve a diverse array of techniques, ranging from developing a congenial rapport with the subject to torture.

==Techniques== ===Deception=== Deception can form an important part of effective interrogation. In the United States, there is no law or regulation that forbids the interrogator from lying about the strength of their case, from making misleading statements or from implying that the interviewee has already been implicated in the crime by someone else. See case law on trickery and deception (Frazier v. Cupp).

Gallery (15)

Connections

Categories