Skip to content
EntityQ475618· pop 22· linked from 1,005 articles

John Byrne

Sign in to save

Also known as John Lindley Byrne, John L. Byrne

author and artist of comic books

Person · Open Library

Born
6 July 1950
Works
277

Top works

  • Marvel Héroes
  • Hellboy
  • Hellboy
  • Hellboy
  • Tales of the New Gods

via Open Library + Wikidata

Music · MusicBrainz

Type
Person
Gender
Male
Origin
United States
Active from
1952-05-14
art popart rockcrossover progexperimental rockpop rockpost-punk

via MusicBrainz · CC0

Listeners · Last.fm

Listeners
1,466
Total plays
5,176

<a href="https://www.last.fm/music/John+Byrne">Read more on Last.fm</a>

via Last.fm · John Byrne

Recent publications · Crossref

5 total works indexed

  1. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple

    · 1996 · cited 200,647x

  2. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold

    · 2021 · cited 41,720x

  3. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology

    · 2000 · cited 36,356x

  4. Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment

    · 2007 · cited 34,339x

  5. The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)

    · 1992 · cited 28,859x

via Crossref · CC0

Quotes

  • I get no sense from Morrison’s work that he has any “love for the genre.” I get the same vibe I get from Moore&mdash;a cold and calculated mixing of ingredients the writer knows the fans like, but to which the writer himself has no eviceral [sic] connection. Nostalgia without being nostalgic, as I have dubbed it. (2004)
  • As I have noted elsewhere, and with the clarity of hindsight, I think Stan and Jack made a mistake when they decided to make Thor the “real” Thor. “Whosoever holds his hammer, if he be worthy, shall possess the power of Thor(r)!” That was really all I needed to know. But, of course, the rest of the Norse mythology began appearing early on, so it was only natural (if a tad anal) that fans should start writing in wondering what had happened to the real Thor. (2007)
  • ...were I in charge of either of the Big Two, my “solution” to the ills of the industry would be to “reset” all the books to where they were at some arbitrarily chosen point in time. Usually I say 1976, for many reasons good and bad. Mostly because that’s the last year when, while actually still working in the Biz, I really still felt like a fan. (2007)
  • To harken back to the pre-Crisis days is to play to exactly what I find most wrong with DC these days&mdash;their idea of “innovation” is to press “rewind”. And that is most definitely catering to the “old” crowd. (2007)
  • As I have said many times, I don’t care if they wipe away every trace of every book I have ever worked on. I just wish they’d stop doing so by pressing the “rewind” button. That’s just creative bankruptcy. (2005)
  • I’d go back to 1975. I commented elsewhere, recently, that pressing the “rewind” button would be a good idea, as long as it was done across the board, and not piecemeal or in stealth mode, a la “Birthright.” Take all the characters back to their status quo circa 1975, but set the stories now. Since the most anal-retentive fanboys need “explanations” for everything, have the Shaper of Worlds do it at M*****. Not sure who’d be up for the job at DC. (2004)

via Wikiquote · CC BY-SA

Wikidata facts

Official website
www.byrnerobotics.com
Image
10.6.17JohnByrneByLuigiNovi1.jpg
Show 3 more facts
Commons category
John Byrne (author)
date of birth
1950-07-06
Commons gallery
John Byrne
Sources (4)

via Wikidata · CC0

Connections

Categories