metaethics
Sign in to saveAlso known as meta-ethics
In metaphilosophy and ethics, metaethics (meta-ethics) is the study of the nature, scope, ground, and meaning of moral judgment, ethical belief, or values. It is one of the three branches of ethics generally studied by philosophers, the others being normative ethics (questions of how one ought to be and act) and applied ethics (practical questions of right behavior in given, usually contentious, situations).
Wikidata facts
Show 1 more fact
- Commons category
- Meta-ethics
via Wikidata · CC0
~21 min read
Article
22 sectionsContents
- Metaethical questions
- Moral semantics<!--'Moral semantics' redirects here-->
- Cognitivist theories
- Moral realism
- Ethical subjectivism
- Error theory
- Non-realist cognitivism
- Non-cognitivist theories
- Centralism and non-centralism<!--'Moral centralism', 'Moral non-centralism', and 'Non-centralism' redirect here-->
- Moral ontology<!--'Moral ontology' redirects here-->
- Moral universalism
- Moral relativism
- Moral nihilism
- Moral epistemology<!--'Moral epistemology' redirects here-->
- Moral knowledge gained by inference
- Empiricism
- Moral rationalism
- Ethical intuitionism
- Moral skepticism
- See also
- References
- External links
In metaphilosophy and ethics, metaethics (meta-ethics) is the study of the nature, scope, ground, and meaning of moral judgment, ethical belief, or values. It is one of the three branches of ethics generally studied by philosophers, the others being normative ethics (questions of how one ought to be and act) and applied ethics (practical questions of right behavior in given, usually contentious, situations).
While normative ethics addresses such questions as "What should I do?", evaluating specific practices and principles of action, metaethics addresses questions about the nature of goodness, how one can discriminate good from evil, and what the proper account of moral knowledge is. Similar to accounts of knowledge generally, the threat of skepticism about the possibility of moral knowledge and cognitively meaningful moral propositions often motivates positive accounts in metaethics. Another distinction is often made between the nature of questions related to each: first-order (substantive) questions belong to the domain of normative ethics, whereas metaethics addresses second-order (formal) questions.