nothing-to-hide argument
Sign in to saveAlso known as nothing to hide, nothing to hide argument
argument that one doesn't need privacy unless someone is doing something wrong
Described at

Privacy Protects Bothersome People
martinfowler.com →A couple of concrete examples should make this easier to see. The first is that of journalists. Journalism is itself a profession that's noticeably suspect to Sturgeon's law . But the frivolousness and disrepute that tarnishes much journalism doesn't invalidate good journalism when it happens. Good journalism is about helping us understand what is happening in the world, such journalism often requires asking hard questions of those in power, and digging behind the surface to find truths that the powerful would rather remain hidden. Such digging is considerable bother to those in power, particularly when it exposes corruption or incompetence. A second example is activists who are looking to change our society. Such activists, by their nature, are often trying to change accepted habits of behavior. They may be clamoring for gay rights, or against abortions, or against factory farming. Their protests and campaigns will often be against the interests of those in power, and thus their activities are considerable bother - especially as they gain traction. So let's suppose you're in power, you're being bothered by journalists and activists, and you have access to metadata about everyone's telephone calls. With this information you can find out who your tormentors are talking to, where their sources of information are, who is supporting them with encouragement and funds. You can act against these people to block their support. You may also find things out about your tormentors and supporters that can be used to discredit them. An activist in favor of gay rights is likely to know many gay people, often in places where homosexuality is considered abhorrent. That's a vulnerability that you can exploit. Furthermore your tormentors are unlikely to be saints, most people have things that can look bad, particularly when you can apply a powerful spin. A journalist's substance abuse problem may not be stopping her expose corruption, but you can use it to derail her efforts. The Washington Post reports on an internal NSA audit saying that the NSA has 2,776 “incidents” in one year where they violated rules or court orders on surveillance. Glen Greenwald's partner was held at Heathrow Airport , and his electronic equipment confiscated, under legislation intended to be used for investigating terrorism. An Associated Press investigation describes widespread abuse of law-enforcement databases in the United States One investigative journalist who has been subject to a lot of harassment is Laura Poitras, a 2012 MacArthur Fellow and award-winning documentary filmmaker. Her experiences have been documented by Salon and the New York Times Magazine . PJ, the host of the excellent Groklaw site that's been helping to explain the law and act to defend the open sources community, explains why lack of privacy has made her quit . It expands my argument into the role privacy plays in psychological well-being. Some psychological experiments show evidence that surveillance causes people to suppress opinions that they think are minority opinions.
Excerpt from a page describing this subject · 6,777 chars · not written by Vinony
Wikidata facts
Show 1 more fact
- described at URL
- martinfowler.com/articles/bothersome-privacy.html
via Wikidata · CC0