Skip to content
paradox

File:Liars_paradox.svg · Wikimedia Commons · See Wikimedia Commons

EntityQ483372· pop 100· linked from 877 articles

Also known as antinomy, logical paradox

A paradox is a logically self-contradictory statement or a statement that runs contrary to one's expectation. It is a statement that, despite apparently valid reasoning from true or apparently true premises, leads to a seemingly self-contradictory or a logically unacceptable conclusion. A paradox usually involves contradictory-yet-interrelated elements that exist simultaneously and persist over time. They result in "persistent contradiction between interdependent elements" leading to a lasting "unity of opposites".

AI overview

A paradox is a statement that seems to contradict itself even though it may be based on valid reasoning and true facts. Paradoxes matter because they reveal contradictions in how we think about the world and can point to deeper truths by showing how seemingly opposite things can coexist and depend on each other.

AI-generated from the Wikipedia summary — may contain errors.

In the Vinony graph

Within Vinony's link graph, paradox is referenced by 877 other articles, and connects out to Willard Van Orman Quine, proposition and Monty Hall problem.

Vinony files it under Concepts in epistemology, Concepts in logic and Concepts in metaphysics.

Its subject is documented across 79 Wikipedia language editions.

Wikidata facts

Image
LargeTribarGotschuchenAustria.JPG
Show 2 more facts
Commons category
Paradox
Sources (5)

via Wikidata · CC0

~11 min read

Encyclopedic overview

18 sections
Contents
  • Common elements
  • Self-reference
  • Contradiction
  • Vicious circularity, or infinite regress
  • Other elements
  • Quine's classification<!--"Quine's classification of paradoxes", "Veridical paradox", and "Falsidical paradox" redirect here-->
  • Veridical paradox
  • Falsidical paradox
  • Antinomy
  • Ramsey's classification
  • In medicine
  • As an aspect of reality
  • Teaching tool
  • See also
  • References
  • Notes
  • Bibliography
  • External links

A paradox is a logically self-contradictory statement or a statement that runs contrary to one's expectation. It is a statement that, despite apparently valid reasoning from true or apparently true premises, leads to a seemingly self-contradictory or a logically unacceptable conclusion. A paradox usually involves contradictory-yet-interrelated elements that exist simultaneously and persist over time. They result in "persistent contradiction between interdependent elements" leading to a lasting "unity of opposites".

In logic, many paradoxes exist that are invalid arguments, yet are nevertheless valuable in promoting critical thinking, while other paradoxes have revealed errors in definitions that were assumed to be rigorous, and have caused axioms of mathematics and logic to be re-examined. One example is Russell's paradox, which questions whether a "list of all lists that do not contain themselves" would include itself and showed that attempts to found set theory on the identification of sets with properties or predicates were flawed. Others, such as Curry's paradox, cannot be easily resolved by making foundational changes in a logical system.

Excerpted from Wikipedia’s “paradox” article, available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 licence.

Gallery (3)

Connections

Categories