
reproducibility
Sign in to saveAlso known as reproducible, replication (scientific method), reproducibility of results, technical reproducibility, reproducibility of findings
Reproducibility, closely related to replicability and repeatability, is a major principle underpinning the scientific method. For the findings of a study to be reproducible means that results obtained by an experiment or an observational study or in a statistical analysis of a data set should be achieved again with a high degree of reliability when the study is replicated. There are different kinds of replication but typically replication studies involve different researchers using the same methodology. Only after one or several such successful replications should a result be recognized as sci
Research
666,326 papers- Reproducibility in chemistry research.Heliyon · 2024
- Reproducibility blues.The EMBO journal · 2015
- Reproducibility of COVID-era infectious disease models.Epidemics · 2024
- Reproducibility of mass spectrometry based metabolomics data.BMC bioinformatics · 2021
- Reproducibility of blood pressure and heart rate reactivity: a meta-analysis.Psychophysiology · 1996
via PubMed
Wikidata facts
Show 1 more fact
- Commons category
- Reproducibility of results
via Wikidata · CC0
~15 min read
Article
11 sectionsContents
- History
- Terminology
- Measures of reproducibility and repeatability
- Reproducible research
- Reproducible research method
- Reproducible research in practice
- Noteworthy irreproducible results
- See also
- References
- Further reading
- External links
Reproducibility, closely related to replicability and repeatability, is a major principle underpinning the scientific method. For the findings of a study to be reproducible means that results obtained by an experiment or an observational study or in a statistical analysis of a data set should be achieved again with a high degree of reliability when the study is replicated. There are different kinds of replication but typically replication studies involve different researchers using the same methodology. Only after one or several such successful replications should a result be recognized as scientific knowledge.
==History== thumb|right|Boyle's air pump was, in terms of the 17th century, a complicated and expensive scientific apparatus, making reproducibility of results difficult. The first to stress the importance of reproducibility in science was the Anglo-Irish chemist Robert Boyle, in England in the 17th century. Boyle's air pump was designed to generate and study vacuum, which at the time was a very controversial concept. Indeed, distinguished philosophers such as René Descartes and Thomas Hobbes denied the very possibility of vacuum existence. Historians of science Steven Shapin and Simon Schaffer, in their 1985 book Leviathan and the Air-Pump, describe the debate between Boyle and Hobbes, ostensibly over the nature of vacuum, as fundamentally an argument about how useful knowledge should be gained. Boyle, a pioneer of the experimental method, maintained that the foundations of knowledge should be constituted by experimentally produced facts, which can be made believable to a scientific community by their reproducibility. By repeating the same experiment over and over again, Boyle argued, the certainty of fact will emerge.