File:Square_of_opposition,_set_diagrams.svg · Wikimedia Commons · See Wikimedia Commons
syllogism
Sign in to saveA syllogism (, syllogismos, 'conclusion, inference') is a kind of logical argument that applies deductive reasoning to arrive at a conclusion based on two propositions that are asserted or assumed to be true.
A syllogism is a type of logical argument where you start with two statements that are assumed to be true and use deductive reasoning to reach a conclusion. It matters because it provides a structured way to test whether conclusions actually follow logically from the statements that support them.
AI-generated from the Wikipedia summary — may contain errors.
Wikidata facts
- Image
- Syllogismus-Beispiel.svg
Show 1 more fact
- Commons category
- Syllogisms
via Wikidata · CC0
~27 min read
Article
30 sectionsContents
- Early history
- Aristotle
- Medieval syllogism
- Boethius
- Peter Abelard
- Jean Buridan
- Modern history
- Boole's acceptance of Aristotle
- Basic structure
- Polysyllogism
- Types<!--linked from 'Term logic'-->
- Examples
- Barbara (AAA-1){{anchor|Modus Barbara}}
- Celarent (EAE-1){{anchor|Modus Celarent}}
- Darii (AII-1){{anchor|Modus Darii}}
- Ferio (EIO-1){{anchor|Modus Ferio}}
- Baroco (AOO-2){{anchor|Modus Baroco}}
- Bocardo (OAO-3){{anchor|Modus Bocardo}}
- ''Barbari (AAI-1)''{{anchor|Modus Barbari}}
- ''Celaront (EAO-1)''{{anchor|Modus Celaront}}
- ''Camestros (AEO-2)''{{anchor|Modus Camestros}}
- ''Felapton (EAO-3)''{{anchor|Modus Felapton}}
- ''Darapti (AAI-3)''{{anchor|Modus Darapti}}
- Table of all syllogisms
- Syllogistic fallacies
- Other types
- See also
- References
- Sources
- External links
A syllogism (, syllogismos, 'conclusion, inference') is a kind of logical argument that applies deductive reasoning to arrive at a conclusion based on two propositions that are asserted or assumed to be true.
In its earliest form (defined by Aristotle in his 350 BC book Prior Analytics), a deductive syllogism arises when two true premises (propositions or statements) validly imply a conclusion, or the main point that the argument aims to get across. For example, knowing that all men are mortal (major premise), and that Socrates is a man (minor premise), we may validly conclude that Socrates is mortal. Syllogistic arguments are usually represented in a three-line form:
Gallery (52)
Available in 66 languages
- Español
- Français
- Deutsch
- 中文
- 日本語
- Русский
- Português
- Italiano
- العربية
- हिन्दी
- Albanian
- Albanian
- Armenian
- Azerbaijani
- Bahasa Indonesia
- Basque
- Belarusian
- Breton
Show 47 more
- Bulgarian
- Catalan
- Central Kurdish
- Croatian
- Czech
- Danish
- Esperanto
- Estonian
- Filipino
- Finnish
- Galician
- Greek
- Hebrew
- Hungarian
- Icelandic
- Ido
- Interlingua
- Kazakh
- Kyrgyz
- Latin
- Lithuanian
- Low German
- Luxembourgish
- Macedonian
- Marathi
- Nederlands
- Norwegian
- Novial
- Occitan
- Palatine German
- Piedmontese
- Polski
- Romanian
- Serbian
- simple
- Slovak
- Slovenian
- Svenska
- Tiếng Việt
- Türkçe
- Ukrainian
- Urdu
- Uzbek
- Wu Chinese
- zh_yue
- فارسی
- 한국어
via Wikidata sitelinks · CC0